Sunday, May 18th
  • About MoonProject
  • Advertise at MoonProject
  • Sponsored Guest Posts
  • Contact Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Apps

MoonProject

  • Home
  • Categories
    • Art
    • Business and Employment
      • Finance
    • Book Reviews
    • Cars
    • Cooking
      • Food
    • Current Affairs
    • Dating/Relationships
    • Fashion & Style
    • Education
      • History
      • University
    • Entertainment
    • Environment
      • Animals
    • Film
      • Reviews
    • Health & Beauty
    • Lifestyle
    • Miscellaneous
      • Fiction
      • Free Giveaways
    • Music
      • Reviews
    • Politics
    • Popular Culture
      • Celebrity
      • Shopping
    • Religion
      • Philosophy
      • Spirituality/Psychology
    • Science
      • Health
    • Sport
    • Technology
      • Apps
      • Gadgets
      • Gaming
      • Internet
    • Television
    • Travel and Places
  • Submit an Article
  • About MoonProject
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Register
MoonProject Latest: Interested in reviewing restaurants, hotels or travel destinations? For everything 'Hospitality' visit EatSleepTravel.co.uk
You are here: Home » Current Affairs » Feminism to blame for ‘hook-up’ culture

Feminism to blame for ‘hook-up’ culture

December 8, 2013 1:00 pm

I was astonished to read Susan Dench’s column the other week that implied feminism had indirectly led to this new-found ‘hook-up culture’. One thing is for sure, Dench surely would not be able to voice her opinion without feminism.

The column attacks feminism, claiming that the movement has caused a shift in traditional values, thus leading to how men and women see each other. However, Dench’s romanticized view of life prior to women’s liberation is a naive way to offer up answers to the ‘hook-up’ culture of today. Women endured constant sexism and had very few rights. To solve the question as to why we are in this situation, consumerism should be scrutinized.

Baywatch girls Due to consumerism, in the United Kingdom the majority of us spend our time looking at a screen. This opens the window to a constant barrage of messaging, whether it be on the internet or the telly. We are told, we should be sexy, we should all hop around in our underwear, we should smell sexy and be seductive at all given moments. This is not just directed at women, men are also victims of this. However, what do these advertisements show us? One thing is for certain, it is not promoting mutual respects from either sex or appreciation of natural beauty. Consumerism enhances expectation of the opposite sex and therefore promotes and encourages casual sexual encounters, free from emotion.

Due to consumerism we are made to feel inadequate. There is so much pressure to push ourselves in every aspect of our lives, to be the most accomplished, the prettiest, and the most hard-working.  Media portrays this picture of a perfect person and we therefore feel pressured to succumb to this, when in reality, this utopian figure is unobtainable. Yet we feel we have failed if we do not achieve this status, ultimately lowering the way in which we value ourselves, thus offering and explanation as to the increase in casual sexual encounters.

The lack of respect we hold for ourselves and male our counterparts explains the huge influx in recent years of casual, emotionless sex. However, is this such a bad thing? Again, the media depicts this image that having one-night stands and multiple sexual partners makes us failures. We are, therefore, deemed to be lacking purity, a credit that is so highly praised in today’s society. Do not get me wrong, I cast doubt on just how empowering casual trysts really feel. However, should we be made to feel that we can’t engage in them due to societal opinion?

Feminists such as Virginia Woolf have fought for the boundaries of sex to be pushed. It could be argued that casual sex is the ultimate sexual emancipation for women. To be able to engage in this kind of culture is liberating is it not? feminist marchago, women who had sex out of wed-lock were impure and not suitable for marriage (Downton Abbey taught me a lot). It was not lady-like to enjoy sex or to want for this.

Women have much more freedom in regards to sexual encounters in contemporary society, albeit not truly emancipated. Yes, maybe women who sleep around are deemed as sluts. However, at least this does not affect women’s place in society or to deter men from wanting to marry us simply due to how many notches we have on our beds .Consumerist society has ultimately made people feel inadequate and, therefore, we are made to go in search of acceptance through the use of casual sex. Whether this is right or wrong is debatable, however, I do believe that such negativity should not be attached to this. We should implore the fact that hook-up culture is part of our society. Fifty years ago the very thought of casual sex would send people to an early grave. Now, it is a common and regular occurrence in our society. Surely that should be implored?

Tags: anti-consumerism consumerism feminism sexual liberation Women
  • Tweet
Author: daisyheathabbott

Like our Facebook Page

Follow Us On Instagram:

[instagram-feed]

Donate

MoonProject needs your donations to keep editing and publishing free of charge. Every little helps!

MoonProject

  • Top Authors
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise at MoonProject
  • Sponsored Guest Posts
  • Categories
  • Submit an Article
  • About MoonProject
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About MoonProject
  • Advertise at MoonProject
  • Sponsored Guest Posts
  • Contact Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Apps
search:
© Copyright 2025 — MoonProject. All Rights Reserved Designed by WPZOOM
  • Adventist Youth Agreement